RE: [sv-ec] email ballot: response due by 11:00am PDT Friday May 1 2009

Yes to all.
 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Mehdi Mohtashemi
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 4:36 AM
To: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] email ballot: response due by 11:00am PDT Friday May 1
2009


 

 

id 48  allow for future enhancement

      __ X __ YES   _____ No

 

id 54  allow for future enhancement

      __ X__ YES   _____ No

 

id 16, 17

   sv-ec agrees with sv-cc resolution to keep these regions for future
use. 

   Reject svdb 2632 statement. 

   __ X __ YES   _____ No

 

id 19  No action required

    __ X __ YES   _____ No

 

id 20    svdb 2634  (svbc issue)

    sv-ec votes as well to accept the proposal as well.

   __ X __ YES   _____ No 

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2634  

 

id 105 (id 110 is duplicate of 105)

     No action required

    __ X __ YES   _____ No

 

id 115  No action required

    __ X __ YES   _____ No

 

 

id 35, svdb 2705    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2705 

 

 

ids 36,37,38,39,40

svdb 2700    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2700  

 

 

id 41, svdb 2681    __ X __ YES   _____ No

[both svbc and svec will vote on this]

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2681  

 

 

id 42, svdb 2682    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2682 

 

 

id 43 and id 45, 

svdb 2430    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2430   

 

 

id 44, svdb 2701    __ X __ YES   _____ No

[both svbc and svec will vote on this]

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2701  

 

 

id 46, svdb 2706    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2706 

 

id 47, svdb 2713    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2713  

 

id 57, svdb 2698    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2698 

 

id 65, svdb 2723    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2723 

 

id 67, svdb 2358    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2358  

 

Note on 2358: the wording "both when ... and with" is a little confusing
and difficult to parse, though I know what is meant.  I don't quite feel
strongly enough to vote against it.  I might suggest a friendly
ammendment to re-word without the use of "both".

 

id 80, svdb 2596    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2596 

 

id 102, svdb 2718    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2718 

 

id 106, svdb 2710    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2710 

 

id 107, svdb 2711    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2711  

 

id 181, svdb 2514    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2035 

 

id 182, svdb 2514    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2514 

 

id 183, svdb 2510    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2510 

 

id 184, svdb 2473 

CLOSE 2473,  id 184 requires no further action:

[ Draft8 says

  An associative array type or class shall be illegal as a 

  destination type. So this has already been made illegal.]

   __ X__ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2473 

 

id 185, svdb 2342    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2342 

 

id 186, svdb 2288    __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2288 

 

id 192, svdb 1256     __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1256  

 

 

svdb 2719 for the following  ids

id  58  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id  60  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id  61  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id 104  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id 108  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id 112  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id 117  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id 118  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id 119  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id 122  __ X __ YES   _____ No

id 137  __ X __ YES   _____ No

http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2719 

 

 

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.