[sv-ec] Email ballot: I misunderstood 2510

From: <jonathan.bromley_at_.....>
Date: Thu Apr 30 2009 - 07:15:03 PDT
I fear I didn't correctly understand Mantis 2510 (ballot ID #183) when I
reviewed it for the vote.  Striking that sentence from 14.3 doesn't relax
the requirement that clocking signals must be static.  I had wrongly
inferred that it would.

However, we do need to be a little careful: in the Mantis 2510 
description Dave says "dynamic variables as a whole should
be legal"; that's true provided they are variables that have static
lifetime.  Once again, though, this is implicit in existing LRM text.

Consequently, I wish to change my vote on this item to YES.

Apologies for the distraction.
-- 
Jonathan Bromley


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Apr 30 07:15:49 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 30 2009 - 07:16:35 PDT