~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jonathan votes YES to all EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING 4 ITEMS: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ id 181, svdb 2035 _____ YES __X__ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2035 If it's illegal to have methods with static lifetime, then the word "default" in the first sentence of the proposal should be deleted; methods are automatic whether you like it or not, and there's no question of a default. I will change my vote to YES if this is done as a friendly amendment. id 183, svdb 2510 _____ YES __X__ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2510 I completely disagree with this change. Clocking blocks are static declarative constructs, fixed at elaboration time, and the linkage between a clocking block and its clocking signals is essentially static. This change may possibly make sense as a future enhancement but I see no reason to implement it at this time. id 186, svdb 2288 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2288 Since this is about getting the wording right, we should stop using the ill-defined word "entry" and restrict the description to indices only. I would change my vote to YES if the words "entry whose index" were replaced with "index whose value" in both sentences. svdb 2719 all YES except id 60 _____ YES __X__ No The first occurrence of "typedef" in this sub-proposal should be replaced with "type". I will change my vote to YES if this is done. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Complete list of items and my votes follows: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ id 48 allow for future enhancement __X__ YES _____ No id 54 allow for future enhancement __X__ YES _____ No id 16, 17 sv-ec agrees with sv-cc resolution to keep these regions for future use. Reject svdb 2632 statement. __X__ YES _____ No id 19 No action required __X__ YES _____ No id 20 svdb 2634 (svbc issue) sv-ec votes as well to accept the proposal as well. __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2634 id 105 (id 110 is duplicate of 105) No action required __X__ YES _____ No id 115 No action required __X__ YES _____ No id 35, svdb 2705 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2705 ids 36,37,38,39,40 svdb 2700 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2700 id 41, svdb 2681 __X__ YES _____ No [both svbc and svec will vote on this] http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2681 id 42, svdb 2682 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2682 id 43 and id 45, svdb 2430 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2430 id 44, svdb 2701 __X__ YES _____ No [both svbc and svec will vote on this] http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2701 id 46, svdb 2706 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2706 id 47, svdb 2713 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2713 id 57, svdb 2698 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2698 id 65, svdb 2723 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2723 id 67, svdb 2358 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2358 id 80, svdb 2596 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2596 id 102, svdb 2718 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2718 id 106, svdb 2710 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2710 id 107, svdb 2711 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2711 id 181, svdb 2035 _____ YES __X__ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2035 If it's illegal to have methods with static lifetime, then the word "default" in the first sentence of the proposal should be deleted; methods are automatic whether you like it or not, and there's no question of a default. I will change my vote to YES if this is done as a friendly amendment. id 182, svdb 2514 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2514 id 183, svdb 2510 _____ YES __X__ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2510 I completely disagree with this change. Clocking blocks are static declarative constructs, fixed at elaboration time, and the linkage between a clocking block and its clocking signals is essentially static. This change may possibly make sense as a future enhancement but I see no reason to implement it at this time. id 184, svdb 2473 CLOSE 2473, id 184 requires no further action: [ Draft8 says An associative array type or class shall be illegal as a destination type. So this has already been made illegal.] __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2473 id 185, svdb 2342 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2342 id 186, svdb 2288 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2288 Since this is about getting the wording right, we should stop using the ill-defined word "entry" and restrict the description to indices only. I would change my vote to YES if the words entry whose index were replaced with index whose value in both sentences. id 192, svdb 1256 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1256 svdb 2719 for the following ids id 58 __X__ YES _____ No id 60 _____ YES __X__ No The first occurrence of "typedef" in this sub-proposal should be replaced with "type". I will change my vote to YES if this is done. id 61 __X__ YES _____ No id 104 __X__ YES _____ No id 108 __X__ YES _____ No id 112 __X__ YES _____ No id 117 __X__ YES _____ No id 118 __X__ YES _____ No id 119 __X__ YES _____ No id 122 __X__ YES _____ No id 137 __X__ YES _____ No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2719 -- Jonathan Bromley Consultant Doulos - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemVerilog * SystemC * PSL * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: + 44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 http://www.doulos.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doulos Ltd is registered in England and Wales with company no. 3723454 Its registered office is 4 Brackley Close, Bournemouth International Airport, Christchurch, BH23 6SE, UK. This message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos, unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Apr 29 03:01:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 29 2009 - 03:01:56 PDT