By the way ... I just noticed in Mantis that I'd already filed something about bin names. I've just added as a note Swapnajit's question about bin names as covergroup arguments; it is clearly related. http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2382 So this will have to wait until the next version of the standard. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM [mailto:Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM] Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 11:25 AM To: Scott, David Cc: Swapnajit Chakraborti; sv-ec@eda.org Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Ballot issue #106 I agree, this is out of scope, unless there is some other ballot item that mentions these points. Neil On 04/24/09 09:29, David Scott wrote: > Well, again, I think the instructions from P1800 are to work on ballot > issues only. Neil can confirm. > > I don't think the first point is very unclear. Look for the phrase > "will not track" in the paragraph about covergroup arguments. > > The second case may actually be unclear (I started off writing that it > wasn't.) The visibility of the arguments should follow the same rules > as resolving arguments in any other scope. However, the coverpoint is a > sub-scope of the covergroup scope, so the bin name should arguably hide > (or override) the name in the higher scope. On the other hand, bin > names really aren't visible in the language, except in cross select > expressions, so maybe they don't. Yes, this should probably be > clarified, but it is not a ballot issue against 1800-2009. > > Dave > > > > Swapnajit Chakraborti wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> Did you get a chance to look at the two points that I raised alongwith >> #106? These were not part of the >> ballot, but were posted to the reflector as comments. I am mentioning >> them once again for your reference. >> >> - Use of "input" type arguments as part of coverpoint expressions. I >> do not see an >> issue with this but just wanted to clarify as LRM is silent on this. >> LRM just shows >> "ref" arguments being used as coverpoint expressions. >> - Use of covergroup arguments as bin name. Probably we should mention >> in LRM >> that this should be an error. An example of this is given below: >> covergroup cg (int f1,..)@.. >> coverpoint a { >> bins f1 = {..}; // Note "f1" is used as bin name >> } >> endgroup >> >> Regds, >> Swapnajit >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] *On >> Behalf Of *Scott, David >> *Sent:* Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:56 AM >> *To:* sv-ec@eda.org >> *Subject:* [sv-ec] Ballot issue #106 >> >> This is the one about covergroup arguments using "output" ... >> >> http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2710 >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, >> and is >> believed to be clean. >> > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Apr 24 13:29:57 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 24 2009 - 13:31:09 PDT