Re: [sv-ec] Ballot issue #106

From: David Scott <david_scott_at_.....>
Date: Fri Apr 24 2009 - 09:17:14 PDT

I believe we were told to work on ballot issues only.  I'd like clarification from Mehdi and Neil on that.

Dave


Rich, Dave wrote:

I would really like to make a covergroup output/inout arguments illegal. There is no reason to allow these other than sloppiness.

 

I would also like to address ballot #110 in the same proposal by mentioning that a ref argument is treated as const ref, and that const ref only requires type compatibility with wires and variables.

 

Dave

 

 

---

From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Scott, David
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 3:26 PM
To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] Ballot issue #106

 

This is the one about covergroup arguments using "output" ...

 

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2710

 

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. Received on Fri Apr 24 09:18:43 2009