RE: [sv-ec] Ballot issue #106

From: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich_at_.....>
Date: Thu Apr 23 2009 - 21:19:55 PDT
I would really like to make a covergroup output/inout arguments illegal.
There is no reason to allow these other than sloppiness.

 

I would also like to address ballot #110 in the same proposal by
mentioning that a ref argument is treated as const ref, and that const
ref only requires type compatibility with wires and variables.

 

Dave

 

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Scott, David
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 3:26 PM
To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] Ballot issue #106

 

This is the one about covergroup arguments using "output" ...

 

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2710

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Apr 23 21:29:43 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 23 2009 - 21:30:26 PDT