I don't think it is really appropriate to have class properties declared as automatic. They are either static, or not static. If they are not static, they are allocated dynamically in the class object, not in a stack frame like automatics. But I suppose you could think of them as being allocated "automatically" by new, instead of by entering their scope. At any rate, I don't think there would be any problem with allowing an explicit "automatic" to mean nonstatic. Does C++ allow auto to be used on a class property? On the second question, I don't think there is any distinction for a class property between a class qualifier of static and a lifetime of static. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jan 20 11:32:13 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 20 2009 - 11:33:01 PST