RE: [sv-ec] class property lifetimes

If the BNF allows some syntax, we need to define its semantics, or make
it illegal, or my third choice: just allow it and ignore the fact that
the lifetime of a class property is slightly different from the way we
have defined automatic variables, 

 

Static class properties have lifetimes that are identical to the way we
have defined static variables.

 

Dave

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:14 AM
To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
Cc: Feldman, Yulik
Subject: [sv-ec] class property lifetimes

 

Hi,

 

Can a class property be declared as automatic?

It would be redundant, but the BNF allows it.

However, some tools are not allowing it.

 

Also, with respect to a class property, not a method, is there a
difference whether the 'static' keyword is considered to be a
class_item_qualifier or a lifetime?

 

I don't think it makes a difference, but I want to check.

 

Thanks,

Shalom

 

Shalom Bresticker

Intel Jerusalem LAD DA

+972 2 589-6582

+972 54 721-1033

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
 
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.