I agree with Jonathan. Note that that same BNF footnote says also that "the optional parenthesised identifier_list after the keyword with shall be illegal" and it is also (deliberately) omitted from the syntax in G.5. Shalom > > So I carefully noted in the G.4 (now G.5) text that > > > > The specific form > > applicable to std::randomize is summarised here > > > > and intentionally omitted the option of a null argument. > > And the approved proposal for 2279 also says (at the top of page 3): > > ADD normative footnote to Annex A.10: > XX) In a randomize_call that is not a method call of an > object of class type (i.e. a scope randomize), ... > the use of null shall be illegal. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Sep 7 07:26:20 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Sep 07 2008 - 07:27:58 PDT