A postscript to my previous mail: > So I carefully noted in the G.4 (now G.5) text that > > The specific form > applicable to std::randomize is summarised here > > and intentionally omitted the option of a null argument. And the approved proposal for 2279 also says (at the top of page 3): ADD normative footnote to Annex A.10: XX) In a randomize_call that is not a method call of an object of class type (i.e. a scope randomize), ... the use of null shall be illegal. -- Jonathan Bromley Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com This message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Sep 6 07:56:56 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 06 2008 - 07:57:06 PDT