Re: [sv-ec] Editorial issues with proposal for Mantis 2279

From: <jonathan.bromley_at_.....>
Date: Sat Sep 06 2008 - 07:49:56 PDT
A postscript to my previous mail:

> So I carefully noted in the G.4 (now G.5) text that
> 
> The specific form
> applicable to std::randomize is summarised here
> 
> and intentionally omitted the option of a null argument.

And the approved proposal for 2279 also says (at the top 
of page 3):

ADD normative footnote to Annex A.10:
XX) In a randomize_call that is not a method call of an 
object of class type (i.e. a scope randomize), 
... 
the use of null shall be illegal.
-- 
Jonathan Bromley
Consultant

DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services

Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, 
UK
Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223                   Email: 
jonathan.bromley@doulos.com
Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573                           Web: 
http://www.doulos.com

This message may contain personal views which
are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sat Sep 6 07:56:56 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 06 2008 - 07:57:06 PDT