RE: [sv-ec] Virtual interface initialized with inst_name.modport

From: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich_at_.....>
Date: Thu Aug 28 2008 - 01:19:57 PDT
Oh, that's what you had an issue with. Yes, it was made illegal by
mantis 1330.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Surya Pratik Saha [mailto:spsaha@cal.interrasystems.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:08 AM
> To: Rich, Dave
> Cc: Kakoli Bhattacharya; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Virtual interface initialized with
inst_name.modport
> 
> Hi Dave,
> As per LRM, virtual interface can point to an instance of an
interface.
> But here it is pointing to a modport. I think this is illegal.
> 
> Regards
> Surya
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message  --------
> Subject: Re:[sv-ec] Virtual interface initialized with
inst_name.modport
> From: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich@mentor.com>
> To: Kakoli Bhattacharya <kakoli@cal.interrasystems.com>, sv-ec@eda.org
> Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:28:26 PM
> > As long as the hierarchical reference is legal in the context where
the
> > declaration occurs, it should be legal. It would not be legal inside
a
> > package or $unit.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org
[mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org]
> >>
> > On
> >
> >> Behalf Of Kakoli Bhattacharya
> >> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 12:37 AM
> >> To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
> >> Subject: [sv-ec] Virtual interface initialized with
inst_name.modport
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Consider the following scenario:
> >>
> >> virtual my_interface virtual1 = intf1.top;
> >>
> >> where,
> >> interface my_interface;
> >>   wire in1,in2;
> >>   bit out1,out2;
> >>   modport top(input  in1,output  out1);
> >> endinterface
> >>
> >> Is the above initialization of the virtual interface legal?
> >> Some of the standard simulators pass this but LRM is not clear
about
> >>
> > this
> >
> >> issue.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Kakoli
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> >> believed to be clean.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Aug 28 01:21:43 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 28 2008 - 01:24:36 PDT