Re: [sv-ec] rules for overriding virtual method

From: <jonathan.bromley_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jul 10 2008 - 15:22:05 PDT
[Daniel]
>>Maybe it should be rewrtiten-reworded to make it clear.

[Steven Sharp]
>Perhaps, but I don't think it will affect what
> implementations are doing.
 
I fear that point of view is unreasonably and unfairly 
centred on the big three EDA vendors who, inevitably,
dominate the sv-?c committees.  Daniel works for a fourth
vendor that I believe to be working on an implementation.
Furthermore, English is the second language of almost all the
implementors at that vendor.  We have a collective responsibility
to ensure that the LRM is sufficiently precise and comprehensible
to facilitate their understanding.

If the standard can only be interpreted by those who contributed
to writing it, it ain't much of a standard.
-- 
Jonathan Bromley
Consultant

DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services

Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, 
UK
Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223                   Email: 
jonathan.bromley@doulos.com
Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573                           Web: 
http://www.doulos.com

This  message may contain personal views which
are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Jul 10 15:23:05 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 10 2008 - 15:23:17 PDT