Mark Hartoog wrote: > > 2137 ___ Yes _X__ No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002137 > Why are only sequence match subroutine calls being added > as procedural context? What about sequent match assignment > and increment? > > Good point, which I believe you made before and I failed to capture. I don't think it matters for increment, but assignment can do things like refer to an object data field or function method, which must be in a procedural context to be legal. It would be straightforward to change this to say that sequence_match_item (which includes assignments, increment, and subroutine_call) is a procedural context. If there are no objections, I can do this tomorrow. Would that change your vote to a yes? --Mike -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Dec 13 17:35:48 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 13 2007 - 17:36:18 PST