RE: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST December 15 2007

From: Mark Hartoog <Mark.Hartoog_at_.....>
Date: Thu Dec 13 2007 - 17:00:38 PST
 519, 520, 521, 522, 801, 1809 

 Section a)
CLOSE following mantis items, covered by 1702
 412  _X__ Yes   ___ No  
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000412        

 516  _X__ Yes   ___ No     
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000516        

 517  _X__ Yes   ___ No     
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000517        

 518  _X__ Yes   ___ No     
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000518        

 518  _X__ Yes   ___ No     
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000519        

 520  _X__ Yes   ___ No     
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000520        

 521  _X__ Yes   ___ No     
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000521        

 522  _X__ Yes   ___ No     
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000522        

 801  _X__ Yes   ___ No     
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000801        

 974  _X__ Yes   ___ No  
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000974        
 

  Section b)
      958, 1447,
     1858 [contains two proposals:

  (original proposal) 1858-randomize-constraint-resolution.htm	
                      1858-randomize_with_syntax.htm]
	                1858_local.pdf
     2055, 2137, 2181 2227 


 958  _X__ Yes   ___ No  
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=000958        

 1447  _X__ Yes   ___ No  
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001447        
 
 1858  [Multiple proposal files]
  (original proposal) 
  1858-randomize_with_syntax.htm              ___ Yes   _X__ No  
   I think this syntax is confusing and is not needed.
  1858_local.pdf                              _X__ Yes   ___ No     
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001858        
  
 2055  ___ Yes   _X__ No  
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002055 
   An enhancement that is not backwards compatible.       
 
 2137  ___ Yes   _X__ No  
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002137
  Why are only sequence match subroutine calls being added
  as procedural context? What about sequent match assignment 
  and increment?         
 
 2181  _X__ Yes   ___ No  
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002181        

 2227  _X__ Yes   ___ No  
 http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002227        
 


section a) 
     412 5.14.1 Queue operator examples use aggregate constructors
incorrectly
     522 use of concatenation in 5.14.2 (Francoise)
     521 pattern assignment for queues (Francoise)
     520 example of queues assignment (Francoise)
     519 section 5.14,empty array literal syntax (Francoise)
     518 queues and arrays (Francoise)
     517 concatenation syntax usage section 5.14 (Francoise)
     516 5.7 and 5.8 description of type compatible arrays
     801 Errors in assignment pattern in 5.4 example
    1809 forward references into $unit package

section  b)
    1858 Name binding in inline constraints 
         two separate proposals
    1447 (detailed proposal, fixed up for D4).
     958 dynamic array size method unclear when empty
    2055 coverage bin distribution is not even
    2137 Some assertion contexts should be procedural
    2181 Ambiguity implicit declaration of production variables in
randsequence 

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Dec 13 17:01:18 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 13 2007 - 17:01:28 PST