RE: [sv-ec] Array terminology

From: Jonathan Bromley <jonathan.bromley_at_.....>
Date: Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:23:40 PST
For copying of one unpacked array or slice to another...

> > I believe the LRM currently requires the element types to be 
> > equivalent.

> Yes, 7.6 says,
> Assigning to a fixed-size unpacked array requires that 
[...]
> each element be of an equivalent type. 

Agreed; but it seems odd to me - why enforce equivalent-type
when all you're doing is an element-by-element assignment?

However, I'll willingly go along with "equivalent type" 
to avoid disruption and/or minimize risk.
-- 
Jonathan Bromley, Consultant

DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services

Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223                   Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com
Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573                           Web: http://www.doulos.com

The contents of this message may contain personal views which 
are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Nov 28 08:24:28 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:24:49 PST