For copying of one unpacked array or slice to another... > > I believe the LRM currently requires the element types to be > > equivalent. > Yes, 7.6 says, > Assigning to a fixed-size unpacked array requires that [...] > each element be of an equivalent type. Agreed; but it seems odd to me - why enforce equivalent-type when all you're doing is an element-by-element assignment? However, I'll willingly go along with "equivalent type" to avoid disruption and/or minimize risk. -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Nov 28 08:24:28 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 28 2007 - 08:24:49 PST