RE: [sv-ec] Array terminology

Yes, 7.6 says,

Assigning to a fixed-size unpacked array requires that the source and
the target both be arrays with the same number of unpacked dimensions,
the length of each dimension be the same, and each element be of an
equivalent type. The same requirements shall be in effect if either or
both of the arrays are slices. Assignment is done by assigning each
element of the source array to the corresponding element of the target
array. Element correspondence is defined as leftmost to leftmost,
rightmost to rightmost, irrespective of index values. 

Shalom


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Steven Sharp
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:38 PM
> To: sv-ec@server.eda.org; jonathan.bromley@doulos.com
> Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Array terminology
> 
> 
> >From: "Jonathan Bromley" <jonathan.bromley@doulos.com>
> 
> >One of the current goals of Mantis proposals 1702 and 1447 
> is to make 
> >all kinds of unpacked array other than associative be 
> >assignment-compatible with one another wherever it's 
> reasonable (size 
> >OK, elements assignment-compatible).
> 
> I believe the LRM currently requires the element types to be 
> equivalent.
> 
> 
> Steven Sharp
> sharp@cadence.com
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.