Hi Cliff, I've uploaded a new proposal for 2137 with some of your minor fixes: [CC] In this paragraph, I believe procedures reads better, and indent the always keywords that are sub-bullets of the always procedures bullet. [MB] The 's' on 'procedures' was strikeout in D4, so I'm leaving it as strikeout. I'm assuming it has already been changed once, so we should leave it unless people really think striking it out was a mistake. The indenting was another cut-and-paste error; I've fixed it. [CC] "They" is ambiguous in this paragraph... [MB] I've added your proposed rewording. --Mike Clifford E. Cummings wrote: > Summary of Cliff's votes (see attachment for comments) > > 885 Yes > 1384 Yes > 1609 Yes > 1715 No > 1723 No > 1851 Yes > 2021 Yes > 2055 Yes > 2113 Yes > 2137 No (Minor corrections and clarifications would turn this vote into > a Yes) > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc. > 14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005 > Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486 > cliffc@sunburst-design.com / www.sunburst-design.com > Expert Verilog, SystemVerilog, Synthesis and Verification Training > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Oct 25 09:24:47 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 25 2007 - 09:26:03 PDT