1655 ___ Yes _X_ No This mantis proposal overlaps with Mantis 1237. Doug has also flagged this, but below I offer some additional input. 1237 approved on 9/21/07 and has been incorporated into draft 1 of 1800-2008. "The weight of each item, Wi, shall be a non-negative integral value." This restriction should be specified in a different section. All of the following should probably be modified. 1. Sub-clause 18.6, Table 18-13 2. Sub-clause 18.6.1, Table 18-15 3. Sub-clause 18.9, there are a few structs shown that should be updated struct { int weight; <---- change to 'int unsigned weight;' ... } option; Neil Mehdi Mohtashemi wrote On 04/17/07 15:21,: > > Based on April 16th, 2007 sv-ec meeting, we are conducting an > email vote on the following mantis items. > 1655, 1732, 1777, 1371, 1384, 1707, 1680, 1427, 1723, 1736. > Part 2 of email vote will start next week. > > Please note that the operating guidelines are: > - Only one (1) week to respond (Midnight April 24th 2007) > - An issue passes if there are zero ** NO ** votes and at least > half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote. > - Any NO vote must be accompanied by a reason. > This issue will then be up for discussion at the > next conference call. > > As of the April 16th meeting, the eligible voters are (total 11): > > Arturo Salz, > Cliff Cummings > Dave Rich > Don Mills > Doug Warmke > Heath Chambers > Mark Hartoog > Michael Mintz > Neil Korpusik > Ray Ryan > Stu Sutherland > > Please mark your vote below by an x. If No, then specify a reason. > Send it to the reflector. > > 1655 ___ Yes ___ No > 1732 ___ Yes ___ No > 1777 ___ Yes ___ No > 1371 ___ Yes ___ No > 1384 ___ Yes ___ No > 1707 ___ Yes ___ No > 1680 ___ Yes ___ No > 1427 ___ Yes ___ No > 1723 ___ Yes ___ No > 1736 ___ Yes ___ No > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Apr 20 17:32:15 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 20 2007 - 17:32:32 PDT