Hello SV-EC, Please find my votes below. > 1655 ___ Yes _X_ No The proposal conflicts with resolved Mantis 1237. http://www.verilog.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001237 I will upload a new 1655 proposal that overlays 1237's approved proposal. > 1732 ___ Yes _X_ No I would like to see the example changed to use "const ref" rather than "ref". That is better style for writing covergroups. > 1777 ___ Yes ___ No _X_ Abstain This looks good, but I didn't have time to adequately scrutinize Don's detailed examples. > 1371 _X_ Yes ___ No > 1384 _X_ Yes ___ No > 1707 ___ Yes _X_ No I don't think the final sentence in the proposal is clear enough: "Streaming from left-to-right keeps bits of the generic stream in the same order; streaming from right to left reverses the order of each block." Does this mean "... the order of the bits in each block"? Or does it mean "... the order of the sequence of blocks"? Or both? Should be easy to resolve this with a friendly amendment. > 1680 _X_ Yes ___ No > 1427 _X_ Yes ___ No > 1723 _X_ Yes ___ No > 1736 _X_ Yes ___ No Regards, Doug -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Apr 20 16:24:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 20 2007 - 16:24:24 PDT