[sv-ec] cycle delays in assignments

From: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich_at_.....>
Date: Fri Feb 02 2007 - 13:51:29 PST
 

I know we agreed in the face-to-face that

 

##k cb.v <= e;

should use the default clocking. 

 

I don't remember if we touched upon the following: 

 

 

v = ##l e; //blocking assignment with intra-assignment delay - uses
default clocking block

v <= ##m e;//non-blocking assignment - uses default clocking block

cb.v <= ##n; e; //clocking drive - uses CB clock

 

From the 11/6 face to face, we had:

Agreements reached: 
      Don't make scheduling decisions based on the target.
 
Is this an exception? Or should all ## delays be based on the default
clocking.
 
We're trying to finish up 890.
 
Thanks,
 
Dave

 

David Rich
Verification Technologist
Design Verification & Test Division
Mentor Graphics Corporation
dave_rich@mentor.com
Office:   408 487-7206
Cell:     510 589-2625

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Feb 2 14:26:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 02 2007 - 14:26:23 PST