Shalom, Maybe it should be "cast to a packed or unpacked array type". Consider from 4.14 -- "In a static cast, the expression to be cast shall be enclosed in parentheses that are prefixed with the casting type and an apostrophe. If the expression is assignment compatible with the casting type, then the cast shall return the value that a variable of the casting type would hold after being assigned the expression." -- Brad [ In reply to http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-ec/hm/3796.html .] ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 4:54 AM To: sv-ec@eda-stds.org Subject: [sv-ec] "string literal" and "literal string" The term "string literal" occurs 42 times in 1800. "literal string" appears 4 times, in 3.1, 3.6 (next to last para.), 4.7 (para. 3), and 23.2 (page bottom). On the face of it, they appear to refer to the same thing. But if so, this statement from 3.6 appears to be a tautology: "String literals can also be cast to a packed or unpacked array, which shall follow the same rules as assigning a literal string to a packed or unpacked array." Can anyone explain? Thanks, Shalom Shalom Bresticker Intel Jerusalem LAD DA +972 2 589-6852 +972 54 721-1033 I don't represent IntelReceived on Wed Nov 15 08:18:41 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 15 2006 - 08:19:02 PST