RE: [sv-ec] Version 8 of the proposal for mantis item 978 was uploaded

From: Rich, Dave <Dave_Rich_at_.....>
Date: Mon Aug 28 2006 - 09:10:56 PDT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 1:31 AM
> To: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.com; SV_EC List
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Version 8 of the proposal for mantis item 978 was
> uploaded
> 
> I don't see that these changes completely solve two of my issues.
> 
> 1. If there is no order, then is what sense does find_first find the
> 'first'? What is the benefit of such a method? And what is the benefit
> of having both find_first and find_last?
[DR>] No order only applies to the results returned by find and
find_index. find_first/last only returns a one element array.
> 
> 2. Deleting the last example in 5.15.4 does not solve the problem
> brought up in 1087, as expressed by Arturo. What is the meaning of
being
> able to specify the array dimension? I don't understand how it would
be
> used.
[DR>] 
I would leave the example in and also leave 1087 open. 
> 
> Shalom
Received on Mon Aug 28 09:11:06 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 28 2006 - 09:11:10 PDT