>From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com> >I don't see that these changes completely solve two of my issues. > >1. If there is no order, then is what sense does find_first find the >'first'? What is the benefit of such a method? And what is the benefit >of having both find_first and find_last? Based on input from Arturo at today's SV-EC meeting, there will be further work to remove the statement that there is no order to the traversals. The find methods will have a defined order. >2. Deleting the last example in 5.15.4 does not solve the problem >brought up in 1087, as expressed by Arturo. What is the meaning of being >able to specify the array dimension? I don't understand how it would be >used. The discussion agreed with your point here. The dimension argument should be removed, as should the text related to it. There will be further work to do this. Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.comReceived on Mon Aug 28 14:41:58 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 28 2006 - 14:42:11 PDT