RE: [sv-ec] Coverpoints on nets/wires

Swapnajit,

 

I agree with you in thinking this was an oversight.

 

I would also add that a covergroup ref argument should really be treated
as an implicit const ref argument. Then we define the semantics for
connecting wires to const ref arguments of tasks and functions.

 

Dave

 

 

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda-stds.org
[mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda-stds.org] On Behalf Of Swapnajit
Chakraborti
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 5:55 AM
To: SV_EC List
Subject: [sv-ec] Coverpoints on nets/wires

 

Hi,

 

The LRM mentions that only integral variables can be used as
coverpoints. There is no mention of nets/wires being supported as
coverpoints. Is there any specific reason to exclude nets/wires from
being declared as coverpoints? Or this is just an oversight and we can
probably file a mantis for rectifying this?

 

Regds,

Swapnajit.