Brad, I believe there were some email exchange on this subject, based on those, we do not see any issue with the mailbox return item, so at this point there is no need for sv-ec to take this item as erratum. Regards, - Mehdi ________________________________ From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:38 PM To: sv-ec@eda.org Cc: Maidment, Matthew R Subject: [sv-ec] Re: Mailbox - null return In http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/4469.html , Dave explains to the SV-BC about an apparent mailbox erratum found by Cliff. But mailboxes are an SV-EC issue. Could the SV-EC please look into this issue, and if, as Dave convincingly argues, it is truly an erratum, take ownership of it? Thanks, -- BradReceived on Tue May 9 23:19:06 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 09 2006 - 23:19:21 PDT