RE: [sv-ec] Invalid example of srandom - mantis 1391

But as the examples states, these are just class handles, is says
nothing about being methods.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Brad
> Pierce
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 12:17 PM
> To: sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Invalid example of srandom - mantis 1391
> 
> I think users don't want to be warned about usages like the following
> example from 7.11
> 
>    p.next.next.next.val
> 
> -- Brad
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Graham [mailto:pgraham@cadence.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 12:11 PM
> To: Ray_Ryan@mentor.com
> Cc: doug_warmke@mentor.com; Arturo.Salz@synopsys.COM;
> Dave_Rich@mentor.com; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.COM; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Invalid example of srandom - mantis 1391
> 
> > The optional parentheses certainly contribute the ambiguity.
> 
> Do we _really_ want to go with optional parentheses?  They
> bring no value to the language, and just complicate things.
> You can bet there will be differing interpretations for all
> these corner cases.
> 
> Paul