Re: [sv-ec] Invalid example of srandom - mantis 1391

I think users don't want to be warned about usages like the following
example from 7.11

   p.next.next.next.val

-- Brad

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Graham [mailto:pgraham@cadence.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 12:11 PM
To: Ray_Ryan@mentor.com
Cc: doug_warmke@mentor.com; Arturo.Salz@synopsys.COM;
Dave_Rich@mentor.com; Brad.Pierce@synopsys.COM; sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Invalid example of srandom - mantis 1391

> The optional parentheses certainly contribute the ambiguity.

Do we _really_ want to go with optional parentheses?  They
bring no value to the language, and just complicate things.
You can bet there will be differing interpretations for all
these corner cases.

Paul