RE: [sv-ec] RE: [sv-ac] division of responsibilities

Hi Shalom,
 
Sub-Committees are open to discuss all issues that seem relevant to 
their topics of interest, any member can open a mantis item and place a
proposal. Usually it is the chair's responsibility to see where the
mantis item
fits best for review and taking action.  We have done this in several
occasions
between Matt and I (sv-bc, sv-ec).  
In the particular case of clocking blocks and coverage, sv-ec has been
looking
at these issues in more depth, so it would be good to relay the majority
of discussion
through SV-EC.   
Your suggestion for making sure the sub-committees are cc'd would be
great.
 
Regards,
- Mehdi

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Bresticker, Shalom
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:48 AM
To: Faisal Haque (fhaque); sv-ac@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] RE: [sv-ac] division of responsibilities


  

Hi, Faisal.

In IEEE standards terminology, chapters are called clauses.

I'm worried about one of the sub-committees discussing issues and making
changes which unknowingly affect the other sub-committee.

I guess the best thing to do is to copy both of the sub-committees if
there is a doubt.

It's good that there is some overlap between committee participants.

 

Shalom

 

________________________________

From: Faisal Haque (fhaque) [mailto:fhaque@cisco.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 8:33 PM
To: Bresticker, Shalom; sv-ac@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ac] division of responsibilities

 

Shalom,

I am not sure but I think you meant chapter 17?

.I think if the construct is used only in SVA then it should probably be
owned by sv-ac. If it is general purpose then SV-EC or sv-BC?

For clocking blocks it depends upon the issue and same for coverage.

Can you describe the issue ?

 

Thanks

-Faisal

	 

	
________________________________


	From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Bresticker, Shalom
	Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 12:41 AM
	To: sv-ac@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ac] division of responsibilities

	Hi,

	I'd like to get clarification of the division of
responsibilities between SV-AC and SV-EC.

	Specifically, are all issues outside of Clause 17 the
responsibility of SV-EC (or one of the others)?

	If SV-AC has issues related to clocking blocks or coverage, do
they need to go through SV-EC?

	 

	Thanks,

	Shalom

	 

	Shalom Bresticker

	Intel Jerusalem LAD DA

	+972 2 589-6852

	+972 54 721-1033

	I don't represent Intel