[sv-ec] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800

Forwarding email from Ed...


Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Re: [sv-bc] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 12:46:23 -0800
From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com>
To: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>, <sv-bc@server.eda.org>,
        <sv-ac@server.eda.org>, <sv-ec@server.eda.org>


But the LRM serves as a reference when in doubt about some feature when
writing models. not compilers. I use it that way quite often. Merged
document woudl make it simpler to search for an item and remove
redundancy.

ed



________________________________

	From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Brad Pierce
	Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 2:04 PM
	To: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ac@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ac] Re: [sv-bc] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800


	What is the target audience of an IEEE standards document?  I'm
sure I'll be buying a 802.11n router when they become available, but I'm
sure I won't be reading the associated standards document.  More to the
point, I've never read any C/C++ standards documents, because I do not
write C/C++ compilers.


	Reading the LRMs won't make you an expert user of Verilog and
SystemVerilog.  Reading a single merged LRM won't either.


	-- Brad


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Korpusik                                     Tel: 408-720-4852
Senior Staff Engineer                             Fax: 408-720-4850
Frontend Technologies - ASICs & Processors (FTAP)
Sun Microsystems
email: neil.korpusik@sun.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------