[sv-ec] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800

Forwarding email from Ed...


Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Re: [sv-bc] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:49:10 -0800
From: "Eduard Cerny" <Eduard.Cerny@synopsys.com>
To: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>, <sv-bc@server.eda.org>,
        <sv-ac@server.eda.org>, <sv-ec@server.eda.org>


Absolutely. But a confusing set of specs does not make a good implementation.
Also, it is a question who does what. Usually the two are different people.

ed


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Brad Pierce
	Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 4:52 PM
	To: sv-bc@eda.org; sv-ac@eda.org; sv-ec@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ac] Re: [sv-bc] Opinion on merging of P1364 and P1800


	It's a question of priorities, opportunity cost, return on
investment, and resource constraints.


	Personally, I plan to invest my workdays in helping take tools,
flows, and methodologies to the next level.  Our users demonstrate an
intense results orientation and demand the same from us.  I can't tell
them, "Sorry, we'd love to support that optimization in the next
release, but we'll be merging the LRMs instead."


	-- Brad



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Korpusik                                     Tel: 408-720-4852
Senior Staff Engineer                             Fax: 408-720-4850
Frontend Technologies - ASICs & Processors (FTAP)
Sun Microsystems
email: neil.korpusik@sun.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------