Re: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-bc] coverage_type_option_assignment

I agree. Thanks for sharing the comment.
Kanaparty Rao.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Swapnajit Chakraborti" <swapnaj@cadence.com>
To: <Neil.Korpusik@Sun.com>; <sv-ec@eda.org>
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-bc] coverage_type_option_assignment


>I sent a similar query on Accellera 3.1a draft long back
> (see below).
>
> Thx,
> Swapnajit.
>
>
>
>>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: [sv-bc] coverage_type_option_assignment
>> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 08:49:56 -0700
>> From: Paul Graham <pgraham@cadence.com>
>> To: sv-bc@eda.org
>>
>> I'm looking at p1800 draft 6.
>>
>> The syntax for coverage_type_option_assignment appears in
>> section 18.6.1, but nowhere else.  The 18-6 syntax box has a
>> comment "not in Annex A".  What is the reason for this
>> dangling piece of syntax?  Is it part of the language?
>>
>> Paul
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [sv-ec] covergroup option/type_option assignment
> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:09:59 +0530
> From: Swapnajit Chakraborti <swapnaj>
> Organization: Cadence Design Systems
> To: sv-ec@eda.org
>
> Section 20.6 of LRM mentions that options of a covergroup
> instance can be set procedurally.
>
> Example:
> --------
> cg cg1 = new;
> ...
> cg1.option.weight = 3;
>
> In similar fashion, type_options for covergroup declaration
> can also be set procedurally (section 20.6.1).
>
> Example:
> --------
> cg::type_option.weight = 5;
>
> Syntax 20-5 (page 321) and Syntax 20-6 (page 323)
> of LRM, also describe the BNF for these assignment
> statements. But these rules donot appear in Annex  A
> as well as in http://www.eda.org/sv/SV3.1a_bnf_no_footnotes.htm.
>
> Any specific reason for this?
>
> Thx,
> Swapnajit.