Re: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-bc] coverage_type_option_assignment

I sent a similar query on Accellera 3.1a draft long back
(see below). 

Thx,
Swapnajit.



>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: [sv-bc] coverage_type_option_assignment
> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 08:49:56 -0700
> From: Paul Graham <pgraham@cadence.com>
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> 
> I'm looking at p1800 draft 6.
> 
> The syntax for coverage_type_option_assignment appears in
> section 18.6.1, but nowhere else.  The 18-6 syntax box has a
> comment "not in Annex A".  What is the reason for this
> dangling piece of syntax?  Is it part of the language?
> 
> Paul

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [sv-ec] covergroup option/type_option assignment
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:09:59 +0530
From: Swapnajit Chakraborti <swapnaj>
Organization: Cadence Design Systems
To: sv-ec@eda.org

Section 20.6 of LRM mentions that options of a covergroup 
instance can be set procedurally.

Example:
--------
cg cg1 = new;
...
cg1.option.weight = 3;

In similar fashion, type_options for covergroup declaration
can also be set procedurally (section 20.6.1).

Example:
--------
cg::type_option.weight = 5;

Syntax 20-5 (page 321) and Syntax 20-6 (page 323)
of LRM, also describe the BNF for these assignment 
statements. But these rules donot appear in Annex  A
as well as in http://www.eda.org/sv/SV3.1a_bnf_no_footnotes.htm.

Any specific reason for this?

Thx,
Swapnajit.