Re: [sv-ec] Protection of class types

Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Protection of class types
From: Kevin Cameron x3251 (Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2003 - 09:46:18 PST

• Next message: Arturo Salz: "Re: [sv-ec] Protection of class types"
• Previous message: Francoise Martinolle: "[sv-ec] comments on the LRM changes"
• Maybe in reply to: Arturo Salz: "[sv-ec] Protection of class types"
• Maybe reply: Kevin Cameron x3251: "Re: [sv-ec] Protection of class types"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> From owner-sv-ec@eda.org Mon Mar 24 08:40:35 2003
>
> Kevin,
>
> My proposal was to disallow using the "local" keyword to declare
> nested classes.
>
> Mike

A bit draconian, but a reasonable interim solution I suppose.

Kev.

>
> >> From: "Arturo Salz" <Arturo.Salz@synopsys.com>
> >>
> >> Kevin,
...
> >
> >It wasn't clear to me what Michael was proposing.
> >
> >Kev.

• Next message: Arturo Salz: "Re: [sv-ec] Protection of class types"
• Previous message: Francoise Martinolle: "[sv-ec] comments on the LRM changes"
• Maybe in reply to: Arturo Salz: "[sv-ec] Protection of class types"
• Maybe reply: Kevin Cameron x3251: "Re: [sv-ec] Protection of class types"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Mar 24 2003 - 09:48:38 PST