[sv-bc] Please respond with your #1 SV-BC enhancement priority (due by end of January)

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
Date: Tue Jan 26 2010 - 13:00:06 PST

Background 1: http://www.eda-stds.org/sv-ieee1800/hm/0956.html
Background 2: http://bit.ly/7RDGox
Background 3: http://tinyurl.com/sv-bc-enhancement-requests

Because of the reasons in the above links, Matt and I need your feedback on what SV-BC subscribers consider to be their #1 SV-BC enhancement priority for the next revision, and why. We'll roll it up into a short presentation to the Working Group.

The rules --

   0) This a public process, so all replies go to the reflector, not just to Matt or me.
   1) You must include the number of a Mantis item. If your #1 issue is not yet in Mantis, add it first, or get someone to add it for you.
   2) You must include a reason why this enhancement is critical for users.
   3) Replies due by end of January.
   4) If you believe no SV-BC enhancements should be made in the next revision, that's an OK answer, but it needs a reason, too.

Thanks for your help,
    
-- Brad

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Jan 26 13:00:57 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 26 2010 - 13:01:13 PST