Hi, > > 2. The following can be confusing: "Assignment shall be done by > > assigning each element of the source array [...]" > > In the current LRM text, this text is part of a paragraph describing > > assignment to fixed-size arrays, where there is a requirement that > > the source and target have the same number of elements. Deleting the > > text that restricts the paragraph to fixed-size arrays makes the > > text more general, but it is confusing if either side is dynamic in > size. > > I don't really follow this. Dynamic and queue arrays are effectively > declared [0:N-1] (associative arrays are not in play here) and the > idea of "left-to-right" ordering is, I think, widely understood. > As you say, the paragraph in question is no longer specific to > fixed-size arrays, and the example is only an example... I thought it could be confusing because the target array may need to be resized and the text sounds like it assumes that the proper amount of elements exists. > > 5. This change to 11.2.2, if passed, also resolves Mantis 2533. > > OK, but we aren't permitted to vote on or resolve 2533 because > it's not a ballot issue, I think. If 2380 passes I'll put a > bugnote on 2533 saying it can be closed in the future. No, this is not a change that we are making. It is just a status update, noting that this issue is resolved by the ballot comment response. Regards, Shalom --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jun 9 00:19:50 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 09 2009 - 00:22:30 PDT