Hi, Configurations were intended to replace `uselib, so standardizing `uselib would contradict a decision previously made. I have not heard a significant number of calls to standardize it, either. The reference in 23.11 does call it a non-standard functionality. By the way, there is a proposal in Mantis 1850 to change that paragraph. Shalom > `uselib is a non LRM construct, though most of the standard > simulators and tools support it as Verilog-XL does. Is there > any chance to make it standardized and integrated in SV LRM. > > Also, I saw in LRM section "23.11 Binding auxiliary code to > scopes or instances" there is a reference of `uselib. If > there is no plan to make `uselib standardized then a non-LRM > construct should not be referred in LRM. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Jan 22 02:50:39 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 22 2009 - 02:51:00 PST