Bresticker, Shalom wrote: > But wouldn't people prefer to copy-paste the entire header including the > defaults, without having to edit them out? This is exactly the argument that has been made in the past. I don't have any problem with an LRM definition that would say that a body default *if present* must match the prototype (or previous virtual). That would seem to cover what people in both camps seem to want. I'd be in favor of making such a change in the next PAR. On the original question, I agree with all the other comments that both of the original VMM code snippets are not legal code in 1800-2005/2009. Gord. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Jul 18 07:07:56 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 18 2008 - 07:08:18 PDT