Thanks Steven and Shalom. Somehow I missed 28.6. Neil Bresticker, Shalom wrote: > I agree. This is shown in 28.6. > > But then I think the parentheses around them should be bold red. > > Shalom > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org >> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Steven Sharp >> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 5:29 AM >> To: sv-bc@server.eda.org; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com >> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] BNF for UDP >> >> >>> I am looking for input on the following BNF. >>> >>> >>> In 'A.5.3 UDP body' there is the following. >>> >>> edge_indicator ::= ( level_symbol level_symbol ) | edge_symbol >>> >>> >>> I suspect that it should be the following. >>> >>> edge_indicator ::= level_symbol { level_symbol } | edge_symbol >> No, I believe it is correct. It allows you to specify an >> edge that consists of a specific transition between levels. >> For example, (X1) represents a transition from X->1, and (?X) >> represents a transition from anything to X. >> >> Steven Sharp >> sharp@cadence.com >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous >> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Israel (74) Limited > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Apr 23 14:12:31 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Apr 23 2008 - 14:12:56 PDT