RE: [sv-bc] BNF for UDP

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Tue Apr 22 2008 - 19:36:17 PDT
I agree. This is shown in 28.6.

But then I think the parentheses around them should be bold red.

Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Steven Sharp
> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 5:29 AM
> To: sv-bc@server.eda.org; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com
> Subject: Re: [sv-bc] BNF for UDP
> 
> 
> >I am looking for input on the following BNF.
> >
> >
> >In 'A.5.3 UDP body' there is the following.
> >
> >   edge_indicator ::= ( level_symbol level_symbol ) | edge_symbol
> >
> >
> >I suspect that it should be the following.
> >
> >    edge_indicator ::=  level_symbol { level_symbol } | edge_symbol
> 
> No, I believe it is correct.  It allows you to specify an 
> edge that consists of a specific transition between levels.  
> For example, (X1) represents a transition from X->1, and (?X) 
> represents a transition from anything to X.
> 
> Steven Sharp
> sharp@cadence.com
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Apr 22 19:37:19 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 22 2008 - 19:37:29 PDT