RE: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ac] New keywords in SV-AC proposals

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Fri Mar 14 2008 - 00:42:32 PDT
Hi, 

> I assume that users can define system functions with no 
> arguments, and that the syntax for a call to such a system 
> function would not need to have parentheses.  

The LRM implies that it is allowed.

> If a user 
> defined such a system function named $inferred_clock, then 
> the syntax $inferred_clock used in an expression would refer 
> to that system function, not to the special meaning in this 
> proposal.  That seems like a problem.

I don't think so. The number of user-defined system tasks and functions
is orders of magnitude less than the number of user-defined identifers.

Shalom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Mar 14 00:47:13 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 14 2008 - 00:50:14 PDT