RE: [sv-bc] Email ballot: Respond by Friday, Februrary 29, 8am PST

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Mon Mar 03 2008 - 00:41:05 PST
Tom,

The language of $fatal was weakened to answer Gord's concerns in
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/8040.html. Presumably a good tool would
terminate elaboration as soon as possible.

Shalom 


> >SVDB 1769 ___Yes   _X_No
> >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1769
> >
> [Alsop, Thomas R] I don't understand the difference between a 
> $fatal and an $error system task in the context of 
> elaboration violations.  I see that $fatal is supposed to 
> quit elaboration and error doesn't but it's only a "may be 
> aborted" not a "shall be aborted".  The "may" is my main 
> objection because it implies that some implementations can 
> really make $fatal and $error the same.  In my mind $fatal 
> should absolutely kill elaboration.  
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Mar 3 00:43:31 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 03 2008 - 00:44:06 PST