My votes. -Tom > >SVDB 1526 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1526 >Proposal: >Covered by resolution of SVDB 1707 >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1707 > >SVDB 1709 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1709 >Proposal: >Covered by resolution of SVDB 1707 >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1707 > >SVDB 1769 ___Yes _X_No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1769 > [Alsop, Thomas R] I don't understand the difference between a $fatal and an $error system task in the context of elaboration violations. I see that $fatal is supposed to quit elaboration and error doesn't but it's only a "may be aborted" not a "shall be aborted". The "may" is my main objection because it implies that some implementations can really make $fatal and $error the same. In my mind $fatal should absolutely kill elaboration. >SVDB 2089 ___Yes ___No [Alsop, Thomas R] Abstain. Didn't have time to read through this. >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2089 > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Feb 29 09:20:35 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 29 2008 - 09:20:53 PST