>SVDB 1828 ___Yes _X_No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1828 I have a problem with saying that tools "should" perform these checks when the LRM does not specify exactly what the checks are that "should" be done. It doesn't make sense to say that something is recommended without specifying what it is that is being recommended. I think that "may" is more appropriate here. >SVDB 2008 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2008 Assuming that Gord's issues are dealt with satisfactorily. >SVDB 2219 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2219 > >SVDB 2043 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2043 > >SVDB 1564 _X_Yes ___No >http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1564 Steven Sharp sharp@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Feb 15 18:11:40 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 15 2008 - 18:12:23 PST