Bresticker, Shalom wrote: [...] > > SVDB 2217 ___Yes _x_No http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2217 > > The placement of this text is not clear to me. > The introductory note says, > > "the following text refers to "22.7.2". That reference should be > correct assuming that Mantis 1809 is applied first since 1809 adds > 22.7.1." > > But the text does not have any reference to 22.7.2. Sorry about that - that is hold over from a previous version that I had. I'll remove that comment. > Also, the text is this proposal places it in 22.6. I don't think that is > the place for it. 22.6 deals with only simple downward hierarchical > names and full hierarchical names. This text belongs in either 22.7 or > 22.8. I disagree. 22.7 deals with *upwards* name referencing which is directed at resolution in an upwards manner *across* instantiations. 22.6 deals with general hierarchical names. 22.6.1 & 22.6.2 are talking about how "hierarchical" names and "selects" interact. That is a more general problem than the upwards problem. > Also, regarding "dotted name 1: The first name component is s1. Since > s1 is a directly visible scope name, rule 2 applies and the name s1.x is > considered to be a hierarchical name," it is not clear to me whether and > why s1 is directly visible. It would probably be not clear to other > users as well. Hmmm. Did you just miss the name "s1" on the enclosing generate scope? I think that it is pretty clear why "s1" is directly visible in this case -- it is the name of an enclosing scope. Gord. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Dec 3 07:49:35 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 03 2007 - 07:49:56 PST