RE: [sv-bc] E-mail Vote: Respond by 8am PDT, Monday, October 29

From: Mark Hartoog <Mark.Hartoog_at_.....>
Date: Sun Oct 28 2007 - 23:18:05 PDT
SVDB  909 _X__Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=909

SVDB 1265 _X__Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1265

SVDB 1278 _X__Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1278

SVDB 1360 _X__Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1360

SVDB 1487 _X__Yes   ___No
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1487

SVDB 1489 _X__Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1489

SVDB 1573 ___Yes   _X__No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1573
I think this issue needs to be discussed before we change the language 
in the LRM. I was under the impression that this area was ill defined
in the LRM and implementations may differ in details and corner cases. 

SVDB 1610 _X__Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1610

SVDB 1645 _X__Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1645

SVDB 1750 _X__Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1750

SVDB 1993 ___Yes   ___No  __X__ Abstain
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1993

SVDB 2006 _X__Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2006

SVDB 2029 _X__Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2029

SVDB 2081 _X__Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2081

SVDB 2092 _X__Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2092

SVDB 2097 __X_Yes   ___No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2097

SVDB 2102 ___Yes   _X__No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2102
The change of bit to element is confusing. What is an element.
I think you can have multipe cont assigns to a single field of a
struct, provided they are writing different bits. With the new 
language, I'm confused as to whether the text now makes that 
illegal.

SVDB 2140 ___Yes   _X__No  
http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2140
I am not sure what the impact of making this change would be.
I would like this discussed further.
The proposal also looks garbabled and some of the strike outs
don't make sense.




-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sun Oct 28 23:18:39 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 28 2007 - 23:18:59 PDT