I think you meant 1468. 1473 is the 1step issue. Shalom > Yes on everything but 1473. See comments below. Thanks, -Tom > > SVDB 1468 _X_Yes ___No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468 > > SVDB 1473 ___Yes _X_No > http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=1468 > talsop - I don't see any difference in the new comments from > the comment that the always_latch "executes identically" to > the always_latch. In the always_comb clause is states "The > variables written on the left-hand side of assignments shall > not be written to by any other process." And yet we are > adding this _and_ including the statement "from the contents > of all called function". Isn't this true for always_comb > too? From the emails threads this appears to be legacy > comments. I think "executes identically" is good enough. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Sep 11 00:23:17 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 11 2007 - 00:23:37 PDT