RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1090: `undefineall

I uploaded a new proposal, attached.

Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-bc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:48 AM
> To: Steven Sharp
> Cc: sv-bc@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Mantis 1090: `undefineall
> 
> The text of the current proposal already said,
> 
> "The `undefineall directive shall undefine all text macros 
> previously defined by the `define compiler directive."
> 
> It is possible to remove the additional sentence which refers 
> to command-line switches and to refine the wording of `undef 
> ("The directive `undef shall undefine a previously defined 
> text macro.") to be similar to this.
>  
> 
> > It may still be helpful to keep it in mind while considering the 
> > wording of this proposal.  It would be better not to say that it 
> > undefines all macros, instead saying something about 
> eliminating the 
> > effects of `define directives.  Or that it has the effect 
> of a `undef 
> > applied to all defined macros.
> > However, the description of `undef may have already made 
> this mistake.
> 
> 
> Shalom
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.