hi sv-bc, At Shalom's provocation I've uploaded a proposal for 1134, which has been open and unresolved for a considerable time. From my perspective, the inability to have localparams declared before ports is a serious usability issue and I'd really like to see this change included in 1800-2008. The BNF change is not too drastic, I hope. Is everyone OK with the side-effect that a _class's_ parameter_port_list can also include localparams? My own feeling was that this is harmless, but if it is felt to be undesirable it could easily be fixed either by adding a new production for class_parameter_port_list in the BNF, or by a semantic restriction. -- Jonathan Bromley, Consultant DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services Doulos Ltd. Church Hatch, 22 Market Place, Ringwood, Hampshire, BH24 1AW, UK Tel: +44 (0)1425 471223 Email: jonathan.bromley@doulos.com Fax: +44 (0)1425 471573 Web: http://www.doulos.com The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Jun 9 03:48:15 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jun 09 2007 - 03:48:42 PDT