RE: [sv-bc] Is dynamic variable written in continuous assignment

Dave,

> Those cases are both legal. The array as an aggregate is a static
> variable. The LRM is currently restricting references to members of
the
> array in non-procedural contexts.

[SB] That should be clarified if the restriction remains. I was also
fooled.

> By the way, I have on my to-do list writing a proposal to remove that
> restriction on dynamic variable members (just leaving the restriction
on
> automatics in place). It really should be up to the user to avoid
> out-of-bounds array indexing or null class handle de-references.

[SB] Could you explain your philosophy as to when to leave the
responsibility to the user to get things right and when to protect him
from himself?

Thanks,
Shalom