RE: [sv-bc] Is #4.2step legal?

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Fri May 19 2006 - 06:17:21 PDT
Being as 19.10 explicitly states that step is equal to the global
precision, I think the intent was obvious. This would be just a minor
clarification, not fixing a 'huge oversight'.

Shalom



> Steven is right; this is a huge oversight in the LRM. Section 3.5
needs
> to define the semantics of the 'step' delay as ignoring all local
> timescales and precisions and needs to be defined to be the scaled to
> the smallest global precision.
Received on Fri May 19 06:17:42 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 19 2006 - 06:17:57 PDT